theTripurapost News Images

CAA Extension Sparks Political Firestorm in Tripura: CPI(M) Sees ‘Calculated Divide’

  • By Thetripurapost Desk, Agartala
  • Sep 06, 2025
  • 527

The Union government’s decision to extend the cut-off date under the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) to December 31, 2024, has triggered a fresh wave of political confrontation in the Northeast, with CPI(M) Politburo member and Tripura Leader of Opposition Jitendra Chaudhury calling it a “conspiracy to divide people on religious lines.”

Chaudhury’s sharp remarks go beyond mere criticism of policy. They reflect a broader anxiety that the CAA — already a flashpoint in India’s political discourse — is being recalibrated by the BJP to consolidate electoral ground in sensitive border states like Tripura. His contention that the law “violates the Constitution” is not new, but his linking of the deadline shift with “electoral manipulation” gives the debate a renewed edge.

Tripura’s Infiltration Wound

Tripura has a complex demographic legacy shaped by decades of migration from across the Bangladesh border. Despite fencing and BSF deployment, infiltration remains a persistent political flashpoint. By alleging that “corrupt officials issue documents to infiltrators even before entry,” Chaudhury sharpened the accusation that the CAA extension is less about relief for persecuted minorities and more about creating a legal smokescreen for demographic engineering.

Centre vs Opposition Narrative

For the BJP-led Centre, the extension is positioned as humanitarian — a step to protect minority communities fleeing persecution. But for the Opposition, particularly in the Northeast, it is seen as a political maneuver designed to expand the pool of potential loyal voters. Chaudhury’s claim that the cut-off has been pushed forward “to cross the voting line in the coming days” reflects deep suspicion that citizenship and electoral calculations are being deliberately interlinked.

Constitutional and Electoral Stakes

Chaudhury’s framing of the CAA as “extra-constitutional” resonates with a section of civil society that views religion-based citizenship laws as antithetical to the spirit of the Indian Constitution. By emphasizing that “no law can be framed on the basis of religion,” the CPI(M) seeks to reclaim ground on constitutional morality — a domain often contested between Left, liberal groups, and the ruling BJP.

Northeast’s Growing Anxiety

In the Northeast, the political sensitivity of the issue cannot be overstated. Many fear that demographic shifts will further marginalize indigenous communities. Chaudhury’s warning that “divisions among people will only deepen” if CAA persists taps into these anxieties, which have historically fueled movements for autonomy, identity protection, and even insurgency.

Outlook

The Centre’s notification has effectively reset the CAA debate in Tripura, bringing it back to the political centre-stage. For CPI(M), which has been struggling to regain its once formidable base in the state, opposing CAA offers a rallying point that cuts across community lines. For the BJP, however, it is a calculated gamble: positioning itself as a savior of persecuted minorities while betting that the long-term electoral dividends outweigh the immediate backlash.

As the state braces for future elections, the CAA extension is not just a legal adjustment — it is a political flashpoint that could redefine alignments in Tripura and the wider Northeast.